The simple question is, do we indeed find the truth in Scripture
that believers in this dispensation are under the requirement to give a tithe?
Must we give ten percent (or some other percentage) of our income more or less
as the Israelites did under the Mosaic law? Some teach this by saying that we
are still under the law of Moses in some sense. Others claim this as a
requirement because they assert that the tithe is part of the alleged eternal
moral law of God, because Abraham and Jacob gave ten percent before the law was
given. There is good biblical evidence that both of these propositions are
invalid.
Clearly,
we are not under the law of Moses, according to Romans 6:14 and other passages.
In addition, being under law in general is not a characteristic of this
dispensation. In Romans 6:14, the word ‘law’ has no article. In Greek, this means
that Paul is referring to the nature of law, not the law of Moses in
particular. As Keathley says, “This means we are not under any kind of legal
system of external rules or legal regulations which we are to keep in relation
to our walk with God.”[1]
The
New Testament writers used the term, ‘law’ about 120 times. When Paul says that
we are not under the law, he is talking about the law of Moses. When he talks
about the law of sin (Romans 7:23, 25; 8:2), he is speaking of a principle—not
the Mosaic law. In Romans 6:12-15 and Ephesians 2:15 he is saying that we are not
under the Old Testament law of Moses, which includes the tithe. When we see the
principle in Galatians 5:3 (“I testify again to every man who accepts circumcision
that he is obligated to keep the whole law”), it seems logical that one who keeps
the tithe or the Sabbath—features of the Mosaic law—also “is obligated to keep
the whole law.”
It is true that Abraham offered a tithe before the
institution of the law (Genesis 14:20). But we also must note that Abraham was
circumcised before the law (Genesis 17:10ff). But no one affirms circumcision as a
requirement for believers today. In fact, Paul specifically says that this is
not part of our relationship with God (Galatians 5:11, 12). In addition the burnt
offering was a feature of man’s relationship with God before the law. Noah
offered burnt offerings after the flood (Genesis 8:20) and Abraham was willing to
offer Isaac (Genesis 22:2ff) and actually offered the substitute that God provided
(Genesis 22:13). But obviously, we have not been instructed to offer burnt
offerings under the administration of grace. Instead, we rely on the final sacrifice
of Christ (Hebrews 9:12; 10:10).
In
fact, God did not demand that Abraham give the tithe. Neither did he demand it
with Jacob. There is no evidence that God's people tithed regularly before the law.
The tithe as an obligation is related to the law. Hebrews 7:1-10 has nothing to do
with the tithe as a rule of life, because Abraham “gave tithes of the spoils”
(7:4). This passage does not say anything about Abraham's practice apart from
this incident. And none of the passages on Abraham speak about a normal tithe
on his material goods.
If the practice of tithing were our method of offering to
God today or even if tithing were a supplemental offering in addition to the
free-will offering, it would seem strange that the Apostle Paul never mentions
it. This is true even though he spoke about offerings in two entire chapters of
2 Corinthians (8-9). Especially there it seems odd that he did not mention what
some claim is our proper method of giving today. Neither does Paul mention the
tithe in 1 Corinthians 16:2. In fact, this verse (“as he may prosper”) seems the
opposite of tithing. In 1 Timothy 5:17-18 Paul speaks of financial support for
pastors, but even here does not mention the tithe. In all his teachings, the
great Apostle did not mention tithing even once.
Apart from Hebrews 7:1-10, the concept of a tithe is mentioned
only three times in the New Testament, and these three have to do with the
Mosaic law (Matthew 23:23; Luke 11:42; 18:12). Christ used the term only once—when
he rebuked the scribes and Pharisees for tithing while neglecting the “weightier matters of the
law” (Matthew 23:23; compare Luke 11:42). This also
seems strange if it was supposed to be our practice today. Remember that Christ
in this passage was speaking before his death and resurrection. Tithing was
practiced by the Jews in the time of Jesus, but he had not yet fulfilled the
law. At Pentecost, the new dispensation began, in which God’s method of
administration has changed. After this change of administration, the law was no
longer the way of relating to God. The New Testament never requires us to give
a percentage; on the other hand, we have the principle of 1 Corinthians 16:2, “as he
may prosper,” and also the instruction of Luke 6:38.
Since no commandment concerning the tithe exists under the
dispensation of grace (Ephesians 3:2), and because Paul says we should give
according to how we have prospered, we can conclude that the principle of grace
giving has replaced the tithe. The story is told of a prominent Christian heart
surgeon who was (years ago) making $500,000 a year and living on $36,000. The
balance went to the Lord! This perfectly illustrates the New Testament
principle of giving based on prosperity and gratefulness to the Lord—not as a
sort of tax. Even the idea of using ten percent as a model should be suspect
under grace giving. The fact is, ten percent is a lot easier on $250,000 a year
than it is on $25,000. If we are truly going to follow Paul’s principle of
giving as we are prospered, we need to be consistent, whether it ends up being
only one percent or ninety percent.
Though many are reluctant to admit it, God has indeed changed
or discontinued some of His methods. For example, the obligation to sacrifice
animals is no longer in force. And these sacrifices were practiced before the
law was given. We know that certain principles of the law continue in force
because of the fact that they are repeated under grace. It is not that we obey
these principles because we are under the law in any sense, but rather that they
are part of God's eternal moral nature. Although we are not under law, murder,
for example, is still prohibited under grace, according to such passages as 1
John 2:12. But since we are not under the law, if a principle of the law is not
given under grace, it does not apply to us. A good example would be the
prohibition of work on the seventh day (which, incidentally, is Saturday, not
Sunday).
Legalism dies hard. In fact, it will probably never die
since it has been a problem since the beginning of the Church. And many
theologians and ordinary Christians do not understand—or refuse to accept—the
distinction between Israel and the Church. As part of this problem, the Church
will always have a tendency to see some continuation between features of
Israel’s relationship to God and ours. Not only the tithe, but the priesthood,
the Sabbath, and feasts and festivals will always be among us to cause
confusion about our freedom in Christ in new or untaught believers. But those
of us who are mature must continually model the principles of living under
grace.
[1] ABCs
for Christian Growth, Keathley, J. Hampton III. Biblical Studies Press. www.bible.org, 1996, 1998, 1999. P. 501.